| |
Economic
instruments for overcoming barriers for bioenergy
Carbon taxes imposed on a society would increase
the cost of fossil fuels and therefore make biomass more competitive
since, being carbon neutral, it would be exempt.
Climate change levies on electricity sales
would also have the potential both to provide revenue and
to create awareness if the revenue were used to encourage
the use of biomass. For example, in the UK a climate change
levy was imposed on consumer electricity purchases by business
from April 2001. Special discounts were made available to
the large energy users. Renewable energy projects were exempted
and this, together with the growing interest in selling 'green
energy', created demand for more bioenergy capacity.
Carbon trading is also an incentive where
renewable energy projects can be shown to displace fossil
fuel use. Although trading has begun informally between organisations,
it is not yet known whether carbon emissions trading will
proceed internationally.
Long-term feed-in tariffs are used in Germany
to stimulate the renewable energy market, but elsewhere may
need government-supported contracts to be attractive. Other
grants and subsidies offered by governments
could encourage further uptake of bioenergy projects, but
these would need careful consideration as to the long-term
reliance on them and how future removal would affect the industry.
Increased depreciation rates on plant and
equipment for tax purposes would reduce the investment payback
period and hence help to alleviate the capital investment
and long payback period barriers that bioenergy plants currently
face. Reduced excise taxes, especially if
benefits can be shown to offset the loss in government revenue,
may be applied to the use of fuels with a biofuel component,
as for biodiesel in Austria and ethanol in France.
 |
|
 |
| Green taxes on energy in Denmark |
|
E-85 (ethanol) fuel pump (DOE/NREL) |
 |
After thinning, residues
often remain in the forest
due to high cost of their removal |
|
|