return to homepage
    definition | technologies | sustainability | environment | economy | benefits | implementation                                              expert login
  Anaerobic digestion at Camphill Community Ballytobin, Ireland  
Briqquettes and pellets production in Varazdin, Croatia  
CHP plant at Kahoku Town, Japan  
District heating at Oslo airport, Norway  
District heating in Charlottetown, Canada  
Low-emission biomass plant in Höör, Sweden  
Poultry-litter power station Fibrowat Thetford, UK  
  Links and papers about implementation  
    Julije Domac (Croatia)
Daniel Garcia (Spain)
Kevin Healion (Ireland)
Reinhard Madlener (Austria)
Sarah Nilsson (Sweden)
Keith Richards (United Kingdom)
Horst Scheuer (Austria)
Tatsuo Yagishita (Japan)
 
  View all answered questions  
  Test your knowledge!  
 
                      <   >
 
  Can't find your answer and time is running late? You can always perform a quick search through our site!  
   
  Please send your comments to Task 29 team.

 
current situation | future scenarios | targets and policies | resource potential | barriers
 
 

Barriers


 
Even though biomass has considerable potential for satisfying energy needs, most of this potential is currently not utilised. The role that bioenergy will play in the future will largely depend on overcoming the several barriers to its greater market penetration. The most important of them is the high costs and the perceived risk by investors making bioenergy projects not competitive with other forms of energy. Bioenergy plants usually have higher investment costs compared with fossil fuel plants which increases their payback period and makes them less attractive to potential investors. Increased depreciation rates could reduce the investment cost barrier and encourage increased investment in bioenergy plants. For small investors, a good solution is the joint investment in a larger plant (a typical example of this is the investment by small forest owners in local district heating systems in Austria).


Regulatory and fiscal barriers to biomass still exist in many cases, and include the absence of effective markets such as green pricing to stimulate the biomass industry. Continued subsidies for fossil fuel energy, including incentives offered for further exploration, research and development, and the non-appliance of the associated externalities, together constitute another barrier preventing bioenergy to enter the markets.

Securing adequate supplies of biomass fuel of acceptable cost and quality is a prerequisite for the successful implementation of any bioenergy project and thus the lack of certainty of fuel supply is another significant barrier to bioenergy projects. Fuel supply risks from competing markets for the biomass can be overcome by appropriate contracts and forward sales agreements, which can also cover variations in quality and long term supply requirements to further reduce the risk.

Fuel quality is a particular problem with biomass fuels, since they are often bulky and have a high moisture content, leading to variable and unpredictable quality. Fuel standardization and techniques for fuel upgrading (drying, pelletizing, briquetting) are advancing and will play an important part in the solution of the problem.

Other barriers include the view of biomass by some people as a ‘fuel of the past’, because of its historically low efficiency and high atmospheric emissions. The operation of low-performing conversion technologies in many cases adds to this poor image. Biomass use in open fires or poorly designed bioenergy plants is the cause of health problems and high levels of particulate emissions, but these problems can be overcome by proper installation of clean burning combustors that meet modern air emission standards.

 
Education is an universal answer to many existing barriers   Partnership between rural and urban populations in removing the barriers to bioenergy